---
title: Evaluate OSWorld with Inspect
description: Run OSWorld computer-use benchmark evals in Promptfoo with Inspect, GPT-5.5, Docker-backed desktop sandboxes, scorer output, eval logs, and local traces.
sidebar_position: 66
---

# Evaluate OSWorld with Inspect

OSWorld is a [computer-use benchmark](https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.07972) for agents that operate a real desktop. A task may ask the model to edit a spreadsheet, use a browser, modify a document, or configure an app. The agent receives screenshots, uses mouse and keyboard tools, and is graded against the final VM state.

The `integration-inspect-osworld` example runs an OSWorld eval through [Inspect](https://inspect.aisi.org.uk/) and reports the score back to Promptfoo. Use this pattern when the benchmark already has a mature desktop harness and you want Promptfoo to own the config, assertions, result table, traces, and CI gate around it.

This guide shows you how to:

- run one real desktop task before paying for a larger benchmark
- scale from one sample to an app slice, then to the small and full suites
- separate scored model failures from provider or harness errors
- inspect the desktop trajectory when a result is surprising

OSWorld is useful because success is not judged from the final text alone. An
agent can answer `DONE` and still score `0.0` if the spreadsheet, slide deck, or
desktop state is wrong. That makes it a concrete example of why agent evals need
stateful graders, not only text assertions.

![OSWorld LibreOffice Calc task](/img/docs/evaluate-osworld-with-inspect/osworld-libreoffice-start.png)

## What runs

The default example uses Inspect's `inspect_evals/osworld_small` task, a smaller
OSWorld corpus packaged for Inspect. A second config,
`promptfooconfig.full.yaml`, switches to `inspect_evals/osworld` with
`include_connected=true` for every Inspect-supported full-corpus sample. In the
Inspect version used here, that means 21 default small-suite samples and 246
full-corpus samples. That full run is still an Inspect-supported subset of the
upstream OSWorld paper corpus, not all 369 upstream tasks.

In the sample shown above, OSWorld opens `NetIncome.xlsx` in LibreOffice Calc and asks the agent to compute totals for the `Revenue` and `Total Expenses` columns on a new sheet. That is one generated row in the full suite. Inspect provides the Ubuntu desktop sandbox, screenshots, computer tool, model loop, and scorer.

Use a simple pass-through prompt such as `{{prompt}}` for Promptfoo's row label; Inspect reads the actual task instruction from the OSWorld dataset.

The dated full-corpus GPT-5.5 run later in this guide finished with 242 scored
rows after reruns: 139 passes, 103 scored failures, and 4 repeated provider
errors. Spreadsheet and document tasks were among the strongest clusters, while
cross-app workflows and VLC were harder. Those results are useful both as a
benchmark example and as a reminder that model capability and harness reliability
must be reported separately.

## How the wrapper works

The example is intentionally thin:

1. Promptfoo calls `provider.py` once for each test case.
2. The provider starts `inspect eval <task> --sample-id <id>`.
3. Inspect runs the desktop sandbox and agent loop.
4. Inspect writes a `.eval` log with screenshots, model messages, tool calls, files, scores, and metadata.
5. The provider runs `inspect log dump`, parses the sample score, and returns normal Promptfoo output and metadata.
6. `assertion.py` passes only when the OSWorld sample score is `1.0`.

This means Promptfoo owns orchestration and reporting. Inspect owns the agent runtime and OSWorld grading.

For each generated small-suite row, the provider effectively runs:

```bash
inspect eval inspect_evals/osworld_small \
  --model openai/gpt-5.5 \
  --sample-id 42e0a640-4f19-4b28-973d-729602b5a4a7 \
  --log-dir /absolute/path/to/inspect_logs/<run>

inspect log dump /absolute/path/to/inspect_logs/<run>/<file>.eval
```

![Inspect OSWorld trajectory screenshot](/img/docs/evaluate-osworld-with-inspect/osworld-inspect-trajectory.png)

## Implementation map

The example has six moving parts:

- `promptfooconfig.yaml` is the small-suite Promptfoo entrypoint. It selects GPT-5.5, sets both timeouts, enables tracing, and loads OSWorld rows from `osworld_tests.py`.
- `promptfooconfig.full.yaml` is the full-suite entrypoint. It switches the Inspect task to `inspect_evals/osworld`, sets `include_connected=true`, and loads the full generated row list.
- `osworld_tests.py` calls Inspect's OSWorld task loader and returns one Promptfoo test case per supported small-suite or full-corpus sample, with app and sample metadata for filtering.
- `provider.py` is a file provider with `call_api(prompt, options, context)`. It resolves paths to absolute locations, runs Inspect, dumps the `.eval` file to JSON, and returns Promptfoo output plus metadata.
- `assertion.py` reads `context.providerResponse.metadata.score` and turns the OSWorld scorer result into a normal Promptfoo pass or fail.
- `inspect_logs/` is gitignored run state. Inspect stores screenshots, model messages, tool calls, files, scorer output, and token usage there.

The provider treats three states differently:

- `score >= 1.0`: Inspect completed and OSWorld scored the task as correct.
- `score < 1.0`: Inspect completed and OSWorld scored the task as incorrect.
- provider `error`: setup, Docker, model SDK, timeout, tool execution, log parsing, or missing scorer output prevented a scored sample from being produced.

## Prerequisites

You need Docker because OSWorld runs a desktop environment:

- Docker Engine 24.0.6 or newer
- Docker Compose V2 available as `docker compose`
- Python with Inspect OSWorld and OpenTelemetry dependencies
- The SDK and API key for the model provider you choose

Install the Python dependencies:

```bash
pip install 'inspect-evals[osworld]' openai anthropic opentelemetry-sdk opentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-http
```

For the default config, export `OPENAI_API_KEY`. To use Anthropic instead, export `ANTHROPIC_API_KEY` and override the model in the test vars or provider config.

The first run can build an OSWorld Docker image of roughly 8GB. Real runs can
consume substantial time and tokens; use the verification ladder below instead of
starting with the full suite.

## Run the example

Create the example:

```bash
npx promptfoo@latest init --example integration-inspect-osworld
cd integration-inspect-osworld
```

Start with one exact sample:

```bash
PROMPTFOO_ENABLE_OTEL=true OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT=http://127.0.0.1:4318 \
  promptfoo eval -c promptfooconfig.yaml --no-cache \
    --filter-metadata sample_id=42e0a640-4f19-4b28-973d-729602b5a4a7
```

Then broaden to an app subset once the wrapper works end to end:

```bash
PROMPTFOO_ENABLE_OTEL=true OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT=http://127.0.0.1:4318 \
  promptfoo eval -c promptfooconfig.yaml --no-cache \
    --filter-metadata app=libreoffice_calc --max-concurrency 1 \
    -o osworld-libreoffice-calc.json
```

App filters are still multi-sample runs. In the current `osworld_small` set,
`app=libreoffice_calc` selects three samples; in one local GPT-5.5 verification
on April 29, 2026, that sequential subset took 12m31s and used 533,101 total
tokens. Treat that as scale guidance, not a fixed benchmark.

After the exact sample and app slice both work, run the full traced
`osworld_small` suite:

```bash
PROMPTFOO_ENABLE_OTEL=true OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT=http://127.0.0.1:4318 \
  promptfoo eval -c promptfooconfig.yaml --no-cache --max-concurrency 6 \
    -o osworld-small-results.json
```

To run the same flow from the promptfoo repository source tree:

```bash
PROMPTFOO_ENABLE_OTEL=true OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT=http://127.0.0.1:4318 \
  npm run local -- eval -c examples/integration-inspect-osworld/promptfooconfig.yaml --no-cache \
    --max-concurrency 6 -o osworld-small-results.json
```

To run Inspect's full supported corpus through Promptfoo, use the dedicated
full-suite config:

```bash
PROMPTFOO_ENABLE_OTEL=true OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT=http://127.0.0.1:4318 \
  promptfoo eval -c promptfooconfig.full.yaml --no-cache --max-concurrency 3 \
    -o osworld-full-results.json
```

On a 6-vCPU, 16-GiB Colima VM, `--max-concurrency 3` kept three desktop
containers active without oversubscribing the machine during the reference run.
Choose concurrency from the Docker VM's limits, not only from the host machine's
headline CPU and memory.

The full config intentionally includes connected samples, so it is more
sensitive to runtime network conditions than the default small-suite config.
It also raises the timeout budget because some full-suite Writer rows can exceed
the small config's 30-minute limit:

```yaml
providers:
  - id: file://provider.py
    config:
      timeout: 7500000 # Promptfoo Python worker timeout, in ms
      timeoutSeconds: 7200 # Inspect subprocess timeout, in seconds
```

## Configuration

The provider config sets two timeouts because there are two execution layers:

```yaml
providers:
  - id: file://provider.py
    label: OSWorld via Inspect
    config:
      defaultModel: openai/gpt-5.5
      timeout: 1800000 # Promptfoo Python worker timeout, in ms
      timeoutSeconds: 1800 # Inspect subprocess timeout, in seconds
```

Keep the `tests` block to one line. Put the shared assertion and trace metadata
in `defaultTest`, then load the OSWorld sample list with the standard
[Python test generator](/docs/configuration/test-cases#python) pattern:

```yaml
defaultTest:
  metadata:
    tracingEnabled: true
  assert:
    - type: python
      value: file://assertion.py

tests: file://osworld_tests.py:generate_tests
```

The full-suite config changes the task and loader together:

```yaml
providers:
  - id: file://provider.py
    label: OSWorld via Inspect
    config:
      defaultModel: openai/gpt-5.5
      task: inspect_evals/osworld
      taskParameters:
        include_connected: true

tests: file://osworld_tests.py:generate_full_tests
```

`osworld_tests.py` delegates sample selection to Inspect. It loads the
supported OSWorld samples, derives app metadata from each sample's
`example.json` path, and returns normal Promptfoo test cases:

```python title="osworld_tests.py"
from pathlib import Path
from inspect_evals.osworld import osworld, osworld_small

CONTAINER_EXAMPLE_PATH = "/tmp/osworld/desktop_env/example.json"


def generate_tests():
    dataset = osworld_small().dataset
    return [_test_case(dataset[index]) for index in range(len(dataset))]


def generate_full_tests():
    dataset = osworld(include_connected=True).dataset
    return [_test_case(dataset[index]) for index in range(len(dataset))]


def _test_case(sample):
    sample_id = str(sample.id)
    instruction = str(sample.input)
    app = _normalize_app(Path(sample.files[CONTAINER_EXAMPLE_PATH]).parent.name)
    return {
        "description": f"{app} - {' '.join(instruction.split())[:80]}",
        "vars": {"prompt": instruction, "app": app, "sample_id": sample_id},
        "metadata": {
            "app": app,
            "sample_id": sample_id,
            "testCaseId": f"osworld-{app.replace('_', '-')}-{sample_id.split('-', 1)[0]}",
        },
    }


def _normalize_app(app):
    normalized = str(app).strip().lower().replace("-", "_").replace(" ", "_")
    return "vscode" if normalized == "vs_code" else normalized
```

Those generated `vars` arrive in `provider.py` as `context["vars"]["app"]` and
`context["vars"]["sample_id"]`. The metadata fields are filterable, so you can
run subsets without editing the dataset:

```bash
promptfoo eval -c promptfooconfig.yaml --filter-metadata app=vscode
promptfoo eval -c promptfooconfig.yaml \
  --filter-metadata sample_id=42e0a640-4f19-4b28-973d-729602b5a4a7
```

The provider always passes `sample_id` to Inspect's `--sample-id` flag. Keep
`app` in the generated vars so results can still be grouped by OSWorld
application. The generated metadata normalizes VS Code to `vscode`; multi-app
tasks use `multi_apps`.

Use the run scopes intentionally:

1. `mockllm/model --limit 0` checks the Inspect CLI shape without model spend.
2. `--filter-metadata sample_id=...` is the smallest real end-to-end validation.
3. `--filter-metadata app=...` is a broader app slice and may include multiple samples.
4. No filter on `promptfooconfig.yaml` runs the full small suite.
5. `promptfooconfig.full.yaml` runs Inspect's full supported corpus and is the benchmark-style configuration.

The example enables Promptfoo tracing directly:

```yaml
tracing:
  enabled: true
  otlp:
    http:
      enabled: true
      port: 4318
      host: 127.0.0.1
      acceptFormats:
        - json
        - protobuf
```

`defaultTest.metadata.tracingEnabled: true` enables tracing for every generated
row. The loader's `metadata.testCaseId` gives each row a stable id so the trace
can be correlated with the result.

## Read the results

The provider returns the OSWorld sample id, score, status, final assistant text, token usage, and path to the Inspect log:

```json
{
  "inspect_log_path": "/absolute/path/to/inspect_logs/.../*.eval",
  "score": 0.0,
  "status": "fail",
  "sample_id": "42e0a640-4f19-4b28-973d-729602b5a4a7",
  "model": "openai/gpt-5.5",
  "num_messages": 58,
  "duration_seconds": 617.32,
  "task": "inspect_evals/osworld_small",
  "app": "libreoffice_calc"
}
```

A failed score is still a valid eval result when Inspect completed and the
OSWorld scorer returned `0.0`. Treat provider errors differently: those
indicate setup, Docker, model SDK, timeout, Inspect tool execution, or log
parsing failures before a scored sample was produced.

On subprocess failures, the wrapper keeps Promptfoo results compact: it returns a
concise error and stores the local log path/status/duration, but it does not copy
captured Inspect stdout or stderr into result metadata. Use the local Inspect logs
for detailed screenshots, tool output, and trajectory debugging.

Inspect the exported Promptfoo JSON first:

```bash
jq '.results.results[] | {
  success,
  score,
  error,
  metadata: .response.metadata,
  tokenUsage: .response.tokenUsage
}' osworld-results.json
```

For a benchmark report, separate scored rows from provider errors before you
compute a pass rate:

```bash
jq '[.results.results[] | select((.response.metadata.status // "") != "error")] | length' \
  osworld-full-results.json

jq -r '.results.results[]
  | select((.response.metadata.status // "") == "error")
  | [.vars.app, .vars.sample_id, .response.error]
  | @tsv' osworld-full-results.json
```

Then dump the underlying Inspect log for the row you care about:

```bash
inspect log dump "$(jq -r '.results.results[0].response.metadata.inspect_log_path' osworld-results.json)" \
  > inspect-log.json

jq '{
  status,
  sample_id: .samples[0].id,
  score: .samples[0].scores.osworld_scorer.value,
  final_answer: .samples[0].output.completion,
  model_usage: .stats.model_usage
}' inspect-log.json
```

For benchmark reporting, rerun provider-error samples by exact `sample_id` with
`--max-concurrency 1` before publishing a pass rate. If the rerun produces a
score, count it as a normal pass or fail. If it errors again, inspect the
`.eval` log and report it separately from scored OSWorld failures.

## Reference GPT-5.5 run

As a larger smoke test, we ran all 21 `osworld_small` samples with exact
`sample_id` selectors, GPT-5.5, Promptfoo tracing enabled, and
`--max-concurrency 6`. The concurrent run produced one unscored Inspect
computer-tool runtime error. Rerunning that exact sample alone produced a normal
score of `0.0`, so the final report below treats it as a scored failure rather
than an infrastructure error.

This is not a stable leaderboard number; it is a concrete example of the shape,
cost, and follow-up workflow for a real run on one local machine.

For a comparable run, use the checked-in Python loader, keep the same provider
and `defaultTest` assertion block, and export the results:

```bash
PROMPTFOO_ENABLE_OTEL=true OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT=http://127.0.0.1:4318 \
  promptfoo eval -c promptfooconfig.yaml --no-cache --max-concurrency 6 \
    -o osworld-small-results.json
```

| Metric                          |                         Result |
| ------------------------------- | -----------------------------: |
| Eval id                         | `eval-7hQ-2026-04-28T02:52:18` |
| Error rerun eval id             | `eval-3rI-2026-04-28T03:30:43` |
| Samples                         |                             21 |
| Concurrency                     |                              6 |
| Wall time                       |                         20m 9s |
| Passed                          |                        13 / 21 |
| Scored failures after rerun     |                         8 / 21 |
| Provider errors after rerun     |                         0 / 21 |
| Mean OSWorld score              |                          0.665 |
| Promptfoo trace records         |                             21 |
| Promptfoo Python provider spans |                             21 |
| Total token counter after rerun |                      3,806,976 |

The strongest app clusters in that run were `gimp` and `libreoffice_calc`
at 100% pass rate. `vscode` passed 2 of 3. The hardest cases were mixed
desktop workflows, one OS administration task, the VLC conversion task, and one
near-miss LibreOffice Writer task that scored `0.9615` but did not meet the
strict `score >= 1.0` assertion.

| App                   | Samples | Passed | Scored failures | Mean score |
| --------------------- | ------: | -----: | --------------: | ---------: |
| `gimp`                |       2 |      2 |               0 |      1.000 |
| `libreoffice_calc`    |       3 |      3 |               0 |      1.000 |
| `libreoffice_impress` |       2 |      1 |               1 |      0.500 |
| `libreoffice_writer`  |       2 |      1 |               1 |      0.981 |
| `multi_apps`          |       6 |      3 |               3 |      0.500 |
| `os`                  |       2 |      1 |               1 |      0.500 |
| `vlc`                 |       1 |      0 |               1 |      0.000 |
| `vscode`              |       3 |      2 |               1 |      0.667 |

The rerun target was `multi_apps` sample
`eb303e01-261e-4972-8c07-c9b4e7a4922a`, a task that asks the agent to insert
speaker notes into a PowerPoint file. The original concurrent attempt errored
inside Inspect's `computer` tool while executing a model-requested desktop
command. The isolated rerun completed in 7m 44s, used 288,447 total tokens,
returned final answer `DONE`, and failed only because the OSWorld scorer
reported `compare_pptx_files(...) returned 0`.

## Reference full-corpus GPT-5.5 run

We also ran the dedicated full-suite config against every Inspect-supported
full-corpus sample in the installed version:

```bash
promptfoo eval -c promptfooconfig.full.yaml --no-cache --max-concurrency 3 \
  -o osworld-full-results.json
```

The reference machine exposed a 6-vCPU, 16-GiB Colima VM to Docker, so
`--max-concurrency 3` kept three desktop sandboxes active without pushing the VM
to saturation. Use the Docker VM's CPU and memory limits as the sizing input;
the host machine can have much more capacity than the desktop sandboxes can
actually use.

The raw run completed all 246 selected rows on April 30, 2026 in 5h27m5s and
used 54,421,072 total tokens. It produced 138 passes, 101 scored failures, and
7 provider errors. After rerunning those seven rows sequentially with
`--max-concurrency 1`, three became normal scored outcomes: one pass and two
failures. Four reproduced as provider errors, so the reconciled result is:

| Metric                       |     Result |
| ---------------------------- | ---------: |
| Samples                      |        246 |
| Scored rows after reruns     |        242 |
| Passed                       |        139 |
| Scored failures after reruns |        103 |
| Provider errors after reruns |          4 |
| Pass rate over scored rows   |      57.4% |
| Mean OSWorld score           |      0.594 |
| Main-run wall time           |    5h27m5s |
| Main-run token counter       | 54,421,072 |
| Targeted rerun token counter |  1,917,890 |

The repeated provider errors were useful diagnostic evidence, not failed
benchmark attempts:

- one `libreoffice_impress` row repeated an Inspect computer-tool runtime error
- one `multi_apps` row repeated an OSWorld scorer missing-image-artifact error
- two `vlc` rows repeated an OSWorld scorer desktop-environment error

This is why the guide treats provider errors separately from scored OSWorld
failures. Publish the raw run, the rerun policy, and the reconciled scored
denominator together.

The app breakdown also changes what you learn from the run. GPT-5.5 was stronger
on focused spreadsheet and document edits than on multi-app workflows, and the
`vlc` group combined lower scores with two repeated harness-side failures. A
single aggregate pass rate would hide both patterns.

| App                   | Samples | Passed | Scored failures | Provider errors | Mean score |
| --------------------- | ------: | -----: | --------------: | --------------: | ---------: |
| `gimp`                |      26 |     14 |              12 |               0 |      0.538 |
| `libreoffice_calc`    |      47 |     34 |              13 |               0 |      0.723 |
| `libreoffice_impress` |      46 |     26 |              19 |               1 |      0.599 |
| `libreoffice_writer`  |      23 |     17 |               6 |               0 |      0.750 |
| `multi_apps`          |      46 |     17 |              28 |               1 |      0.435 |
| `os`                  |      19 |      9 |              10 |               0 |      0.474 |
| `vlc`                 |      16 |      6 |               8 |               2 |      0.491 |
| `vscode`              |      23 |     16 |               7 |               0 |      0.696 |

## Inspect logs

Use Inspect logs for trajectory debugging:

```bash
inspect view --log-dir inspect_logs
```

The viewer shows screenshots, intermediate model messages, tool calls, files, scorer output, and token usage. The `.eval` files can contain sensitive screenshots and model outputs, so keep them out of git and avoid sharing them publicly.

## Tracing

The example config starts Promptfoo's local OTLP receiver and passes a W3C
`traceparent` into the Python provider. Set `PROMPTFOO_ENABLE_OTEL=true` so the
Python provider wrapper records a child span with the prompt, response, token
usage, status, eval id, and test case id.

Trace-level visibility into OSWorld itself still lives in Inspect: every run
writes a `.eval` log, and `inspect view` displays the desktop trajectory.
Promptfoo receives one provider span per sample plus result metadata: output
text, score, token usage, sample id, status, and `inspect_log_path`.

You can verify that Promptfoo stored provider spans by checking the result's
trace in the Promptfoo UI, or by asserting on raw spans in a separate
trace-focused config. The real desktop trajectory remains in Inspect unless you
build a bridge from Inspect events to OpenTelemetry spans.

To make the desktop actions Promptfoo-native tracing, the wrapper would need to
translate Inspect events into OpenTelemetry spans or expose a Promptfoo trace
object. Without that bridge, Promptfoo trace assertions such as
`trajectory:tool-used` cannot see the OSWorld mouse, keyboard, or screenshot
steps.

## Reimplementation checklist

To reimplement the wrapper in another repo:

1. Create a Promptfoo file provider with `call_api(prompt, options, context)`.
2. Put shared assertions and trace metadata in `defaultTest`, then load generated rows with `tests: file://osworld_tests.py:generate_tests`.
3. Read `vars.sample_id` for exact runs, and keep `vars.app` for filtering and result grouping.
4. Resolve `basePath`, `logRoot`, and `--log-dir` to absolute paths before invoking Inspect.
5. Run `inspect eval inspect_evals/osworld_small --model <model> --sample-id <id> --log-dir <dir>` for exact samples.
6. Run `inspect log dump <file.eval>` and require `samples[0].scores.osworld_scorer.value` for the selected sample. Treat missing per-sample scorer output as a provider error instead of falling back to aggregate metrics.
7. Return Promptfoo `output`, `metadata.score`, `metadata.status`, `metadata.sample_id`, `metadata.inspect_log_path`, and `tokenUsage`.
8. Make assertion pass/fail depend on the OSWorld score, not the provider's final text.
9. Keep Inspect `.eval` logs out of git and inspect them when scores or provider errors look surprising.

## When to use this pattern

Use this wrapper when you want to:

- Run a real OSWorld desktop task from promptfoo.
- Compare models on a small number of expensive computer-use samples.
- Store benchmark scores beside other Promptfoo evals.
- Use Inspect's viewer for detailed trajectory review.
- Add Promptfoo assertions or CI gates around Inspect's scorer output.

Avoid treating this as a cheap smoke test. OSWorld samples are slow, stateful, and token-heavy. Start with one app or one exact `sample_id`, inspect the `.eval` log, then expand the sample set once the model and environment are stable.